Rocket Blogs
Comparisons
By Rahul Patel
Apr 1, 2026
You already know what you're trying to figure out. Type it. Rocket handles everything after that.
Table of contents
Does Rocket.new support app store publishing?
Can I export my code from Rocket.new on the free plan?
Is Base44 a good choice for mobile apps?
What makes Rocket.new better for long-term growth?
Rocket.new builds production-ready web and mobile apps faster with full-stack generation, code export, and scalability. Base44 works for simple web apps, but Rocket.new wins for speed, flexibility, and long-term growth.
Which AI App Builder Creates Apps Faster?
Which AI app builder creates production-ready apps faster?
Rocket.new does. It generates a working app from a single natural language prompt in minutes. The platform covers web apps and mobile apps with full backend logic already built in. No writing code required.
According to Gartner's forecast via Index.dev, 70% of new applications will use no-code or low-code tools by 2025. Here is what both platforms offer and which one wins.
Rocket.new and Base44 are both AI app builders. Both take natural language prompts and skip writing code.
But they go in different directions.
Both target non-technical users. The key difference is how much they actually deliver.
In simple terms, an AI app builder takes what you type and turns it into a real, working app. In contrast, traditional development often requires extensive coding, environment setup, and configuration, which can slow everything down, especially in the early stages. AI app builders flip that experience.
Many modern tools even support full-stack development in one place, handling everything from frontend screens to backend APIs and data storage.
This also makes AI app builders far more accessible for beginners. You don’t need deep programming knowledge to get started, which lowers the barrier to entry significantly. At the same time, most platforms still allow flexibility; you can tweak the generated code, connect API keys, or extend functionality when needed.
However, there’s a trade-off. While AI app builders dramatically speed up development, they can sometimes limit deep customization compared to traditional coding. For highly complex applications or edge-case requirements, traditional development methods may still be necessary to achieve full control and functionality.
That said, the shift is clear. The low-code and no-code market is growing rapidly, signaling a major move away from purely traditional development toward faster, AI-assisted approaches.
This compresses weeks of app development into hours.
Vibe coding is building apps by describing intent rather than writing code line by line.
You describe what the app should do. The platform turns that into a working app with full-stack logic already in place.
Rocket.new leads this movement. It raised $15 million from Salesforce Ventures and Accel in September 2025, becoming one of India's fastest-growing vibe coding platform startups.
Key points:
When speed matters, Rocket.new is the standout AI app builder.
It converts natural language prompts into full-stack apps. Front-end, backend logic, auth, and database generated in one pass. Rocket.new works for startups, non-technical founders, developers, and agencies.
Why Rocket.new leads the field
Rocket covers both web apps and native mobile apps from one platform. You do not need two separate tools or two separate projects. The platform gives you the full underlying code and a complete code export from the start. No lock-in of any kind.
Core strengths:
Here is where Rocket.new fits naturally:
Base44 is a no-code platform that builds full-stack applications from natural language prompts. It includes built-in auth, database, and hosting. Wix's backing gives it real infrastructure support after the June 2025 acquisition.
| Feature | Rocket.new | Base44 |
|---|---|---|
| Web Apps | Yes (Next.js) | Yes |
| Native Mobile Apps | Yes (Flutter) | No |
| App Store Publishing | Yes | No |
| Full Stack Coverage | Yes | Yes (web only) |
| Natural Language Prompts | Yes | Yes |
Rocket.new wins on efficiency.
The platform handles every app layer in one generation pass, meaning your frontend, backend logic, auth, and database come together without jumping between tools or waiting on separate build steps. Everything moves forward at once, which makes the entire app development process feel seamless from the first prompt.
Efficiency comparison:
Rocket.new supports native mobile apps using Flutter. You can build mobile apps for iOS and Android from the same prompt. App store publishing is built into the workflow.
Base44 does not build native mobile apps. Web only.
Build mobile app details:
Here is how both platforms move from idea to a working app:
Both platforms handle backend logic. The depth differs.
Rocket.new generates full-stack apps with API routes, user auth, database, and server-side logic from a single prompt.
Backend highlights:
Base44 includes built-in backend logic with a generated database and user management. No external database is needed.
It is solid for web-focused full-stack applications. But the backend logic stays inside Base44's platform.
Backend points for Base44:
Both platforms work well for internal tools. Teams use them to build dashboards, trackers, and admin panels fast.
Rocket.new handles internal tools quickly with flexible backend logic and clean code export. You are not tied to one hosting environment.
Internal tools points:
Code export determines long-term growth. Rocket.new gives you more flexibility.
This key difference matters when your app needs custom hosting.
Both platforms offer a free plan. But the experience is very different.
Base44's dual credit system adds budget complexity. Rocket.new's token consumption is simpler month over month.
Key points when sizing up rapid app generation:
Both platforms launch you fast. But scaling is a different story.
Rocket.new supports long-term growth by giving you the full code from day one.
Scalability points:
Base44 supports growth within its ecosystem. Reports show performance slowdowns for apps approaching 200 or more concurrent users.
Scalability points:
The Rocket.new community response has been strong and consistent.
A builder working on a more complex project noted:
"Rocket is working on an extremely complicated website with several APIs, databases and payment interfaces. Support has been amazing in helping me overcome major obstacles that seemed insurmountable." - Trustpilot
Community highlights:
Rocket.new is the right choice for teams that prioritize both efficiency and long-term scalability. While many AI app builders focus only on quick outputs, Rocket.new balances rapid development with structured growth.
It is ideal for:
Base44 is better suited for simpler, more structured use cases where efficiency is less critical than guided development.
It works best for:
However, when evaluating long-term needs:
If your project requires native mobile apps, deeper customization, scalable architecture, or flexible deployment, Rocket.new is the stronger choice.
So what does the full picture tell us?
When evaluating Rocket.new vs. Base 44, which AI builder creates production-ready apps faster, Rocket.new leads on every dimension that matters for serious app development.
Base44 keeps things simple for web apps and is a decent starting point for non-technical teams with web-only needs.
Rocket.new is built for builders who want more. With a 25,000+ templates library, Flutter for mobile, Next.js for web, collaboration tools, and full code export, it is a stronger platform.
If you are ready to turn ideas into production-ready apps, start building on Rocket.new today.
| Code Export | All plans | Paid plans only |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes (25 messages/month) |
| Paid Plans Start At | $25/month | $16/month |
| Templates Library | 25,000+ | Limited |
| Collaboration Tools | Yes | Limited |
| Token Savings | Up to 80% | Not stated |
| Version Control | GitHub sync | Builder plan only |
| Custom Domains | Yes | Builder plan only |
| Vibe Coding Platform | Full | Partial |